There are multiple alternatives
out there for those seeking to hire employees and those seeking to be employed.
The problem is not one of agencies and availability of sources for employees;
the challenge is finding the right match. We ask Mark Dickinson, CEO of Done! Hospitality
Training Solutions, to tell us about the current status and future
direction of online recruitment
Online recruiters have become a
funnel for sourcing candidates. They screen and pass along the most suitable
ones to employers, who then undertake the traditional paper and face to face
interview process (physically or by Skype) at the end of the pipeline. By
entering one's own CV online into one of these systems, one becomes more of a
number in a machine and less of an individual. The challenge of being a part of
an online database of candidates is that you secede control of your key product
'Yourself', and put yourself at the mercy of the numbers game. In our online
database we have over 50,000 candidates registered. Each one of them has filled
in information concerning their criteria. When a customer seeks a candidate it
is the computer that produces the matches. Then when the ideal candidate is
identified, the software can clone that candidate and you will have similar
people from within the database, past or present employed or not, as a
suggested fit for the available vacancy. So the game for online recruitment
agencies is to get a volume of quality candidates loaded into the system so
that they have sufficient database to feed the available opportunities. And, on
the other hand, they also have to have sufficient clients requesting candidates
to ensure that they succeed financially through placing people in jobs.
Is Linkedin one of the most well-known and reliable sources?
Yes. The reason Linkedin is so
powerful is because of the business/professional social-network that it is
based upon. It enables employers to see potential candidate's profiles and see
what he or she has been accredited for by his or her own connections. This goes
a long way to helping an employer in determining the successful qualities of a
potential candidate.
What about others: Monster gulf, for example?
There are great agencies out there; however
they are mostly one way pipelines, processing candidates to their customers,
the employers. Monster gulf and Caterer Global are two of the bigger ones in
our region, both doing an excellent job of supplying candidates. They display a
wide selection of opportunities on their websites and await candidate
registrations. Agencies do not generally truly represent a candidate, and do
not make agreements with individual job hunters to assist them until they are
hired in a position of their choice. There would probably be a good business
opportunity here.
What is the caliber of people applying online and to which vacancies?
The beauty of online is that
there are many types of agencies, boutiques for executives, executive search
companies, and mass recruiters. As global connectivity accelerates, the greater
access there is to agencies, resulting in the broader diversification of
candidates.
What are classic recruiters doing
to face the tech-Invasion?
The smart recruiters are doing
what they always did: investing in great personal relationships with their
clients' HR managers and owners. They don't cut corners; they screen more
tightly and provide strong personal guarantees for replacements.
Which companies recruit online?
I think probably a fairer
question would be, "Which one's don't?" Today, companies should
recruit online as part of diversifying their search for qualified candidates.
What are the advantages and the disadvantages of recruiting through Linkedin
directly rather than a reliable recruitment agency?
The advantage of Linkedin for a
company recruiting is that their HR will most likely have a first or second
level connection with many of the candidates and can find out about that person
pretty easily. This entails a higher level of work on the part of the company
seeking employees, but may give them a greater sense of security. Again, it
depends upon who is recruiting. If it is a large business starting up in the
GCC, then many of their employees will be fresh hires from Asian countries.
There the online agency will not help as much as a personal relationship with a
recruiter who has proved his worth by delivering high quality personnel in the
past. The key disadvantage of Linkedin is that it is time intensive, and the
employees managing the search have to be aware of what they are really looking
for. Additionally there are no guarantees or replacements available should the
employment agreement not work out. Just because an agency is online does not
make it less reliable. Monster gulf have a terrific follow up and will keep on
following for as long as it takes to deliver the type of personal that clients
want. Online executive recruitment agencies rarely want to speak with
candidates; they first identify potential candidates through their databases
until they find a profile fit. After a preliminary check on that candidate,
they will typically present a headliner for the client to see which candidate
attracts them. Once a client indicates an interest then the recruiter will get
in touch with the candidate and prepare them for the interview. Candidates
often report a sense of frustration with agencies because once they submit
their profile they anticipate an immediate response. The reality is rather different,
and for candidates it is a 'sit and wait' game.
Is this a fad or have recruiting agencies truly been bypassed?
Agencies have only been bypassed
if they have allowed themselves to be. There are some classical laces to face
only agencies that are doing more business today than they have ever done, and
cannot keep up with demand. There are online agencies that cannot find
sufficient clients to keep their candidates happy and are therefore unable to
sustain their overheads.
In our opinion online is not a fad,
neither is it the end of face to face' agencies. As in all business, success
will go to those who understand how to create a unique combination of all the
tools available, and are able to adapt their business model to take advantage
of them. Simultaneously, agencies should be seeking additional spokes to their
wheel of products that add greater value to their customers, thus ensuring
their place for the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment